Who is Mystery Babylon?

mystery-babylonThe Catholic Church has been founded in heretical doctrine since its establishment.

It has distorted biblical truths by adding, subtracting, or changing what the Word of God actually declares. This article is about the Jesuit Order of the Catholic Church.

What follows is an excerpt from a blog article I ran across in on a website called European Institute of Protestant Studies. I have been studying theology and apologetics for forty years but the extreme occultic nature of this shocked me.

It is every bit as occultic as the Masonic Lodge or The Church of the Latter Day Saints, the Mormons. and it is almost as maliciously evil as Islam.

Now to be clear what follows is from the Jesuit Order.

It is called the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction. There are two versions, but they vary little.

The first is the Oath is also quoted by Charles Didier in his book Subterranean Rome (New York, 1843), translated from the French original. Dr. Alberto Rivera, who escaped from the Jesuit Order in 1967, confirms that the induction ceremony and the text.

The second is the Jesuit Oath recorded in the Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session, of the United States Congressional Record (House Calendar No. 397, Report No. 1523, 15 February, 1913, pp. 3215-3216).

As they are quite lengthy I will not quote them in their entirety. For the complete ritual go here or here.

Tocropped-calcuttajesuitslogo set this up “when a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar.”

On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS. The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers.

Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:”

The Superior priest begins the ritual with a lengthy hortatorial oath beginning thus:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man.jesuit-logo

It goes on to posit that the postulant is to pretend he is in agreement with whatever religion, sect, or denomination is mixing with at the time—he is after all a spy. He is to obtain “their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits.”

As with Islam’s taqiyya, lying to gain an advantage, so too the Jesuit is do what is necessary, even going so far as to denounce vehemently the Catholic Church and the Pope to gain the upper hand.

The Superior continues with:

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace.

All of this is to the end that the apostate Catholic Church “might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.”

It goes on of more of the same and echoes strongly what has been already stated. The postulant then must assert his loyalty . . . to Christ? No no, he must to be all things to all men, for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto death.”

Not for Christ who died for all, but for a man, a little minded, power hungry man with the title of Pope.

When the Superior concludes the postulate or candidate gives an affirming response which begins thusly:

I, ______ now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus . . .

Notice Jesus Christ is not mentioned in any of this! The Society of Jesus clearly has nothing to do Jesus, but this satanic society of the Jesuit Catholics.

Now comes the horrendous declaration of death.

The postulant further promises to wage war “secretly or openly against all heretics.” Heretics are defined as anybody not a Catholic.

He is to do this upon direction and “exterminate them from the face of the whole earth” and killing them regardless of

 . . . age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants’ heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race.

This is perhaps where Islam took some of their sick dogmas from.

This closes out with a Q & A between the Superior and the Postulate. This you can look this up for yourself if interested here.

However the last command of the Superior is this:

Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated.

Adam and Eve bought into Satan’s “small lie” in the Garden and man and Creation was cursed. In the fullness of time God will redeem it all, but it will be bloody and painful for those who do not Do you know the True Christ.

The True Church of Christ awaits the Blessed Hope.

A Pope for the World

Ahh yes, Pope Francis. Sure and what a grand and lovely man he is too.

How can you knock a religious leader who is on Rolling Stone? And Time can’t seem to get Pope Francis on the cover often enough.

Life, Fortune, Vanity Fair, National Geographic, but finally the BIG time–the Pope is on the cover of People magazine–the magazine for or to the celebrities!

.

All of these are sound theological publications, right? Maybe not.

Pope Francis, a Pope for the people–a religious Pope . . . but not too religious; a spiritual Pope, a man embracing all religions–“a new world Pope” as Time calls him. What’s not to like, right? He is also in there fighting for socialist causes, i.e. climate change and the environment.

All that notwithstanding the Pope, unlike Muslim leaders, gets no bow from our Muslim president (yes, small p) when he visits America–only a handshake.

Obama bows-or not

Of course Pope Francis has prayed and worshiped at the Blue Mosque himself so perhaps it really is meaningless who bows to whom and what their religious beliefs are when both are heretical.

But what is heresy, we are all the same, Christian, Protestant, Evangelical, Catholic, Methodist, Lutheran, Baptist, Presbyterian, Muslim, Hindu, Confucian, Zoroastrian–we are all going to heaven, right?

Even Ben Carson, a man I respect, in April of this year posited on Facebook, that Jews, Christians, and Muslims all worship the same God!–Really??! Carson is a good man, but his theology is wanting.

Pope Francis has also stated:

In a National Catholic Reporter article entitled Church is essential for faith; there are no ‘free agents,’ pope says. The article’s opening sentence reads, “Christians are not made in a laboratory, but in a community called the church, Pope Francis said.”

I can’t argue with that. We are commanded to be part of a local church body (1 Cor. 12:12).

However deeper into the article “Pope Francis described as ‘dangerous’ the temptation to believe that one can have ‘a personal, direct, immediate relationship with Jesus Christ without communion with and the mediation of the church (italics mine).'” This is clearly antithetical to biblical teaching. Christ, nor the apostles never taught such a thing.

Of course “the mediation of the Church” in the context of a pope and Catholic doctrine is the Catholic Church, not the Church Universal, and “Christian doctrine” is what the pope say it is.

Nevertheless God gave us His standard in the Christian Bible (not the Catholic Bible with the apocrypha). Man’s standard at the end of the day is meaningless. Now you may not chose to believe that and reject God’s free gift of eternal life with Him and that is your prerogative. But I can assure you, you are going to spend eternity somewhere, because the real you is your soul.

It is problematic too that the Pope also seems to believe God is not who God says he is. Speaking at the Pontifical Academy of Sciences the Pope proclaimed:

When we read about Creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was a magician with a magic wand able to do everything. But that is not so. He created human beings and let them develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one so they would reach their fulfillment.

Tacitly he is saying God can create man, but he can’t keep the world going without an outside system, like evolution, to maintain it. In the Pope’s warning about imagining “God was a magician” Francis is in fact characterizing God as a magician, even as he acts as a warner. The whole thesis is a self-defeating statement. Also if one accepts the Pope’s supposition, then what do you do with the virgin birth of Jesus; what do you do with Christ’s resurrection?

But surely the most important thing in this milieu is to be relevant for today. There are no real heresies. As long as we feel good about ourselves when we walk out of our building of worship, be it cathedral, sanctuary, mosque, or the little brown church in the vale, that is what counts.

But there is the conundrum. Is all of this hoopla, this worldly religiosity; does it really bring us into a relationship with the Creator, the God of the Universe or is it all b_ _ _ s_ _t? (Four hail Mary’s and six up your’s Allah). Or is the Bible, God’s Word, true?

A.W. Tozer eloquently said:

The history of mankind will probably show that no people has ever risen above its religion, and man’s spiritual history will positively demonstrate that no religion has ever been greater that its idea of God. Worship is pure or base as the worshiper entertains high or low thoughts of God (A.W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy).

In the letter to the first century Hebrew church the writer stated:

God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world. And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high (Hebrews 1:1-3).

So the Son God spoke through, Jesus Christ, who is called the Son of God by God the Father declared “I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father, but through me (John 14:6).

No the New World Order with its New World Pope is wrong–it is apostate. Catholicism has become a cult, if not an outright false religion.

How can I say that? I can say that because God said it:

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, . . . (1 Timothy 4:1-2).